Address to the conference from Viva Cundliffe PhD abd
Viva Cundliffe, President, GC Green Carbon Inc.
Address to the conference from Viva Cundliffe PhD abd
Viva Cundliffe, President, GC Green Carbon Inc.
It is curious to me as a potential natural weather modification provider why California would not be receiving more precipitation. The convection in the ocean is not known to be irregular to the West. I can model this with a long trajectory triggering protocol using oxygen ions. There is only one reasonable pair of explanations for any place on Earth to be dry: it is being allowed or overlooked.
We can change what has developed in California. I would need help.
I wish you well
Hi this is a warm mention to the great healer, scientist, thinker and leader Mr. David Wilcock at https://www.divinecosmos.com where you can find very comforting and foreward thinking blended with engaging ancient mystery schools and wisdom. David’s music is deeply original, uplifting and varied. Visit his sites and enjoy.
Thank you for your service to the cosmos, David.
Makes 2-8″ pizza crusts 30 minute prep time- Total Gourmet outcome + 15 minutes hand chopping of toppings; PREHEAT oven to 350, mid-lower rack.
Mix dry ingredients, then pour in liquids, and mix w/ Spatula until soft dough balls but not runny. Set this bowl over a bowl of very warm water in another bowl for 25 minutes.
Once risen, you divide, and very gently pat into flat rounds on the well oiled cooking surface to keep bubbles in dough. Curl up edges. Top generously with herb spiked tomato paste, fav. toppings, mozzarella/cheeses.
Bake for 30 minutes, check progress at 20 minutes, 30 minutes with a 375 elevation for 6 minutes at the end produced these two pizzas with golden brown quality mozza cheese on top and very nice textured crusts on a typical cookie sheet.
Gluten Free Pizza Pizzaz– not difficult for commercial pizzerias to add to their menu.
Investment: $6.75 plus 45 minutes quality family time in & out of the kitchen. Unforgettable meal. Homemade wine cost $1.25 and 10 minutes prep time. (more about that later).
NATURAL, NON-TOXIC, REMEDIAL WEATHER MODIFICATION: INTRODUCTION OF THE BACKGROUND SCIENTIFIC THEORY WITH A PROCEDURAL MANUAL FOR OXYGEN ION BASED WEATHER MODIFICATION AND WITH MONITORING, DOSAGE AND DISPERSAL CALCULATIONS FOR THE VANCOUVER, BC CANADA AIR SHED SYSTEM.
By Viva Cundliffe
Global methane levels are set to quickly and unavoidable double CO2 levels, which is going to lower the oxygen content of the ocean. This will kill most of the ocean food chain which is already dying at the larval stage of several species1-4. Only an ocean with a nearer optimal pH can sustain life and absorb CO2. Adding oxygen ions to larvae hatches in captivity must be followed by stepped targeted oxygenation of the ocean. Both oxygen levels and pH are treated at the same time.
If we are going to save ocean life and the capacity of the ocean to absorb our collective CO2 emissions in its buffering system we need to make oxygen ions. They can be made from mining carbon dioxide made by coal plants which have been fully sealed and capture CO2 for this purpose. The carbon from the CO2 is made into different products like graphite, diamond parts, fiber parts, and special powders, and can be recycled.
The Oxygen needs of the global atmospheric remediation and Ocean remediation have been calculated. The combined heat and power base needed is 8GW of coal systems producing CO2 for splitting into oxygen and carbon. The carbon products all have a strong business case and markets. Retired coal assets can be retooled to help mankind handle all of its CO2 emissions on an emergency and ongoing basis. At the same time, toxic geoengineering can be replaced with remedial geochemistry that can reflect heat, modify weather, remove all of its current toxic side effects. We need a global solution and we now have one. You can learn more at http://www.vivacundliffe.com and http://www.gcgreencarbon.com, and help spread this important information to stop our global environmental failure.
We have the chance to use one economic solution to build the technology that will deliver the oxygen ions for the planet.
Oxygen is missing from the ocean because of CO2 dissolving and lowering the pH by raising the hydrogen ion content. Hydrogen and oxygen are two ends of the seesaw in water chemistry balance.
In the atmosphere, Oxygen ions can scrub particles and methane out of the way, and also trigger different kinds of weather naturally. This can be increased safely to help the planet cool by removing heat blocking molecules. The ozone layer can also be repaired by restoring oxygen and it is not healing like we want.
Our lives are full of the many references in the news about how our Earth is failing. We need to act, even in small ways, but we now have a high output system to provide oxygen on the drawing board and the science is open for public oversight. We cannot keep secret a non toxic way to rebalance the Earth system with a proven pH and oxygenating chemistry for seawater and scrubbing and weather ions for the atmosphere that need only a moderate amount of testing as known agents of the air and weather.
The whole plan would cost less than 0.5% of global GDP per year for 6 years and can be spread over a longer period. Can we afford not to gain control of our emissions, when we have an economically positive and healing technology available to us?
Viva Cundliffe PhD abd
The atmosphere almost totally relies upon the hydro oxygens to clean it. Here is proof from over a dozen major institutions: https://acd-ext.gsfc.nasa.gov/People/Jackman/Liang_et_al_2017.pdf
The abstract and introduction are very clear so this really is a full scientific endorsement for OH and hydro oxygens as a route for atmospheric cleanup, especially methane which is coming online.
Further to this the paper reads: “The hydroxyl radical (OH) is the primary atmospheric oxidant, and reaction with tropospheric OH is the most important removal process for many ozone-depleting substances (ODSs), their replacements and other gases that contain one or more hydrogen atoms, e.g., hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs) and hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs). Many of these compounds are also potent greenhouse gases (GHGs) and can exert significant impacts on climate [Rigby et al., 2014; Velders et al., 2015]. The rates at which these long-lived gases are removed from the atmosphere, and therefore, their lifetimes, are dependent on the atmospheric OH abundance. Their lifetimes are used to calculate future atmospheric abundances based on emission projection scenarios. OH is also responsible for removing methane (CH4) and many short-lived atmospheric constituents, e.g., volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and carbon monoxide (CO). Atmospheric mean OH abundance and its interannual variations are important for understanding the observed long-term atmospheric trends of these trace gases [e.g., McNorton et al., 2016; Rigby et al., 2017; Turner et al., 2017].”
So it really is our duty to utilize the Hydroxyl and oxidation route to remove blocks to atmospheric cooling as the Solar system sits in a warm interstellar cloud. Putting up blocks to heat escape are not following sound engineering principles. The cost to do this has been reduced to a system that is less expensive overall than current efforts to cool the Earth, which are killing the biosphere with toxic sediment which traps heat and moisture on its way down. We don’t need to disperse these powders. We need to let Viva Cundliffe and a new team lead a milestone based launch of oxygen ionization, direct ozone repair, methane oxidation, and cooling in logical science based steps, which should reverse some of the damage done and recover the natural system with full public knowledge and oversight. Follow GC Green Carbon on twitter and youtube.
There we go with the new science of Water Vapor Global Cooling where we can use the clouds and natural aerosols to deflect heat off of the Earth. the magnitude available is highlighted in the last graphic below the movie. It should be enough if the interstellar cloud we are in has given us most of its heat already around the Earth and other planets. For references see Viva’s additional blog articles. Please share this blog article and blog link and consider subscribing! Our public work will be journaled here.
These diagrams can be used for reference also:
Viva Addresses this disaster and how we should treat it. Cleaning it up to allow cooling rather adding more mass and obfuscating heat loss…one costs and one is an economic boost with carbon products added and – is a remedy and not a band aid…when do we stop doing the stop gap and recreate most of what we had? I propose half of the methane be oxidized, or prepare for that, and any ice age triggering can be monitored on the way to this dose.
Diamond Parts factory a future concept: Light weight and durable
It is precisely because life has evolved with CO2 that the levels ranges are to be noted and when tied to some biomarkers, do we foresee any issues? It looks like sperm is a vulnerable tissue during what as been coined a mass extinction.
CO2 affects epithelial cells where smooth muscle is and relaxes them in an unknown mechanism,
I looked at sperm function and CO2 specifically as well: CO2 is implicated as an active related agent in reproductive tissues.
Dogs and euthanaisa using CO2 and reproduction with dead dog sperm and eggs.
“Premature Activation”? in Male human sperm?
Male Human DNA integrity issues seen with CO2 exposure times over 24H.
Plant Pollen Across the Board.
This is 16 instances all pointing to CO2 across different works. Spermatozoa is widely known as pH dependent, and when released into the environment where its fluids are diluted puts them at risk, but if that planned change was set up to be manageable and now it is encountering issues, should we be looking at this?
Perhaps at these times the loss of life and the seeming DNA rewrite has this phenomenon partially at the base of it: species abstaining and others with an accidentally safe pH zone for their reproduction processes advance quickly. The flowers in the jungles that are widely blooming right now should be assessed to see if they succeed or fail to reproduce, for a flowering is intended for reproduction mainly. If they do it may be their niche and they may be a big exception to the trend hinted at here.