No carbon budget means that we all technically should stop emitting. How are you going to handle this from a moral perspective. Are you going to find ways to offset your carbon.

This is the warming that is already baked in as of this projection in 2007, which is still accurate.

Our global purpose here really must be to exist on Earth without damaging the key aspects of it that support our life. We have fundamentally failed at this point, and need to correct our management approaches around our physical survival infrastructure. All the finer things in life mean nothing if we are living in chaos, visiting starvation and drought on others through our selfish consumption of material excess represented by the excessive use of carbon products. The wealthy who engage in carbon intensive businesses must be targeted with this knowledge and pressure to change the most. Look at this graphic of how they personally abuse carbon. It should be criminalized: Their businesses and investments must shift off of carbon immediately as well. These are facts not accusations;

Among other concepts, Dr. Tim Garret suggests that Marine Cloud brightening may have a major flaw as a partial solution…

We reached over 60% of peak oil, which was responsible for the population explosion, and now we will fall back, by starvation, to about the richest and best placed 3 billion of us. In order to continue, we will need to have avoided a temperature tipping point of 3C.

For us to succeed, we must remove all GHGs as soon as possible through removal and destruction. We offer hydroxyl radicals as a key method. CO2 sucking and methane sucking is far less efficient but we are now in a desperate situation and may require these regardless.

Do we all care that over half of us are going to die before we stabilize with a completely different resource management system than what we have now. We do not have time to.

Listen to Guy MacPherson now: https://youtu.be/KSASEcQ22Qw

All aspects of the climate are going to get worse and be spurred on further by pending negative feedbacks until we have removed enough greenhouse gas to reverse the warming physics. The aerosol masking effect does nothing to actually solve the 150 year old problem of melting glaciers. If we don’t solve the greenhouse gas problem soon, we will reach one or more tipping points that will be exponentially harder to correct.

Aggressively investing in negative emissions technologies, as well as aggressive emission reduction are our only hope. If we are forced to use aerosol spraying, it will likely be because we reached a tipping point that put us into extreme emergency mode, and we may not be capable of sustaining it.

Please tell everyone about our hydroxyl dispersal technology for municipal governments: Municipal Government GENERIC Intro v 04 W FAQ

This is one major avenue for greenhouse gas removal. All options should be on the table now, and it’s time for real leadership action.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-49125391

It’s past time to scale up greenhouse gas removal systems.

It’s only a matter of time with this June 2019 being the hottest in recorded history, that the forensic reality of CO2 pollution is internalized by everyone as the endangering fact it is. The facts will remove your biases for you as this progresses.

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/07/19/extreme-heat-wave-hits-us-farmers-already-suffering-from-flooding.html?__source=sharebar|twitter&par=sharebar

Here’s the impact of burning all fossil fuels:

https://m.phys.org/news/2016-05-fossil-fuels-earth.html

Read a little about that tipping point here;

https://www.pnas.org/content/105/48/18860

This shows that natural background hydroxyl is in a 24-hour time adjusted period. at 0.5 PPM, and the Gross deficit is 3.28 PPM. This 5+ fold deficit is behind the non-linear build up of pollutants including GHGs. If we don’t rectify this with technology assistance, we are headed for well over 3’C warming.

The truth is, our leaders know what they have to do. Thank you, Greta, for this brilliant speech.

In her May 2019 paper, Dr. Shakova addresses data analysis, and approach errors that signal we need to be ready to mitigate Methane right away.

Shakhova METHANE HYDRATES EMERGENCYgeosciences-09-00251 (1)

From Donald’s desk in Rushden England,

Public Policy vs Emissions Facts

We are taking submissions for the world climate remediation challenge!

Minimal damage to the environment is a key benchmark.

So far, we have the

1. Oxygen earth oxygen airlift and
2. Ground level hydroxyl dispersal,
3. Tethered hydroxyl downdraft protocol
4. Ocean Seeding
5. Marine Cloud brightening

If you have any other good GEOtherapies, please post them in the comments and I will list them here in this article.

Viva Cundliffe

Let’s get the heat out!

Everything on Earth is monetized which means that a resource from the earth is tied to that money; there fore, wealth hoarding is a form of gouging the resources of the earth. When spent, that money again draws more resources from the earth and system, thus, when we encourage expenditures, regenerative projects which increase resources should be the key priority. Wasteful conveniences need to be phased out as society stabilizes at its zenith, or fails.

We do not have to remove wealth, but auditable ceilings on it should be considered properly tied to the Earth’s resources, especially notable is the carbon footprint. Government needs to be at least as awake to this need as consumers are, and put policy in place that ties wealth to the environment, and quantifies its risks to the environment so that there is compliance to a phase down and phase out of these excessive profit models and large holdings. This can be achieved democratically and through both education, taxation, lending, sustainability in manufacturing, regenerative economics.

Who feels wealthy anyway, on a faltering planet, where our movements and purchases are hurting the environment? Being fabulously wealthy while not increasing resources overall is not just a moral issue now- it is a sociopath’s life of crime and deserves to be mitigated and if necessary, democratically punished.  Moderation and regulation in the area of profit ceilings is quite overdue.

This technology treats all GHGS and air quality with nature’s magic bullet, the hydroxyl and it does not require any fans.

Municipal Government GENERIC Intro v 04 W FAQ

Reproduced courtesy GC Green Carbon Inc.

Natural Sciences Geotherapy Association Founded May 27 2019

Employers need to help people start living out net zero carbon periods of time if we are going to succeed at handling this emergency. Sheltering in place, staying at home, working from home, banning single occupant driving need to be sanctioned by our societies.

The honor system has failed us at every level. The only alternative is to proscribe carbon use with permits. It’s the only way we are  going to succeed, and I want you all to succeed.

Perhaps the darkest chapter of our global warming emergency is the policymaker deadlock with the fact that aerosols and particulate matter are having a cooling effect that we will lose as we halt combustion, causing a rebound of warming and taking us into the 2’C warming category.

The way to address this is to remove all reactive GHGs and short lived climate pollutants with technology that emits hydroxyl radicals as we stand down from combustion.

This hydroxyl response would remove 2’C of heat if it were large enough as we shift off of fossil fuels.

Policy makers appear to be paralyzed by this problem of aerosol masking because emissions increased in 2018. We can’t continue this inaction and need complementary work such as hydroxyl dispersal to be started and scaled before we reach a global tipping point as the Arctic is in abrupt warming amplification.

The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists have called for just such a measure as hydroxyl dispersal.

https://thebulletin.org/2019/04/how-to-save-the-arctics-moderating-role-on-global-warming/

Please consider sharing our blog widely.

The sky is a limited container-handle with care!

In science, the convention of working with pollution at its source to stop it presently is not working. How do we know this? Because emissions went up 1.7% in 2018.

So, as an engineer, I’m telling you you have to really cut your personal emissions and the best way to do that is to stop vehicle emissions immediately. And please if you have to use your car, share it with as many people as possible. Make the extra effort to ride share.

In order to successfully target the high emitters of society, you may have to all sign on to a carbon rationing system that won’t hurt you very much, but will target the rich. This sounds political, but it is grounded in fact. Heavy emitters are stealing your climate safety away from you, the average citizen. I apologize for being blunt.

Dr. Kevin Anderson of the Tyndall Center for Climate Change teaches about this very clearly and truthfully, which in these times you deserve to hear. I suggest like he does that the only way to target the rich is through a whole society policy of tradable emissions permits, where all can be held accountable fairly.

We all must bear in mind that Climate Change Canada just issued a comprehensive report in which it states that Canada has officially warmed 1.7’C, which makes the 2’C target the only option instead of 1.5’C for Canada.

https://thebulletin.org/2019/04/how-to-save-the-arctics-moderating-role-on-global-warming?fbclid=IwAR1qVx_ha9pD8eUntFYE5D782bB_Jm32z1AVjITmksXgclbU7rvDGKIr4Tg

Municipalities at the front lines of climate change intervention need the support of Provincial and Federal governments. If they include air and climate quality control as an infrastructure, they are going to need to do it on a global basis.

ReductionTech^tm

Frequently Asked Questions

1. Does this method really assist with outdoor air quality and greenhouse gases?

Yes. The hydroxyl radical is relied upon in nature as the #1 air quality and greenhouse gas removal compound. Its secret is that it persists in the atmosphere until it does react, meaning any enhancement of it will have an additive effect.

2. What are the methods to distribute it through a community?

There are larger facilities with a rooftop dispersal as well as local area utility pole mounted systems. These are automated and require a minimum of servicing.

3. Is the hydroxyl radical really overwhelmed by modern pollutants?

The highest average amount of hydroxyl is 7 ppm and about 20% recycles in the area overnight. This means that total pollutant counts above 8.60 ppm are overwhelming it and are creating a tipping point where the polluted area is now contributing to a build up of greenhouse gases and pollutants that is being exported out of the local area into neighboring regions, and contributing to accelerated global warming and climate damages.

4. Isn’t the atmosphere an unlimited container?

Definitely not and only coordinated removal processes will ensure that we lower pollutant levels and protect infrastructure and lives in the mid and long term. The vast effectiveness of the hydroxyl cleaning ability, which is now overwhelmed, often lulls us into thinking the atmosphere has an infinite capacity.

5. Isn’t the average pollution count still acceptable in urban air?

Our statistics are based on Canadian monitoring that must include particulates and if possible, aerosol counts. The aggregate pollution count is used because hydroxyl attaches to, or breaks up aerosols and PM, so these constituents use it up just as much as the other pollutants. When they are included in urban air, even Canada’s standards allow too much for the natural hydroxyl level.

6. With smart cities, can’t we lower our emission levels?

It’s a long journey and plant stress and plant metabolism from increased CO2, warming and drought alone is increasing aerosol levels even in green cities. Atmospheric brown carbon and black carbon are a global issue and use up the hydroxyl reservoir and are exported to neighboring countries of developing countries that have asserted that they will peak their emissions before considering cutting down. Global emissions rose over 2% in 2018 while 18 single countries lowered emissions and viable direct removal methods like this one at ReductionTech^tm are being scaled up because the global average temperature is still rising, drought, floods and fires are projected to progress by scientists.

https://www.mintdice.com/blog/top-bitcoin-faucets

March 15, 2019 CHEMICAL COMMUNICATION

Viva Cundliffe¹

The Hydroxyl Radical is most likely being inundated by pollution in worldwide air sheds, leading to an overall failure to oxidize methane.

Over 30 air shed reporting sites were consulted to observe and note the pollution levels, and placed in this small calculator to determine what the Hydroxyl deficit was in each area.

In all cases, there was a deficit of the hydroxyl radical when totaled against the listed species. This strongly indicates that the future will include a growing failure by hydroxyls to remove methane, leading to a non-linear climate forcing feedback, which we suggest, has now begun.

This is a snapshot of the calculator, where as noted, a new group can add hydroxyl to the environment that has a deficit. Shown here is an addition of 1.1 ppm, but this leaves still, a deficit of 1.315 ppm in addition to that. The total deficit shown here in this typical air sample is 2.415 ppm, which we suggest, is enough of a deficit (over 25%) to leave room for a cumulative buildup of total methane, as well as other pollutants.

As many will recall, about 25% of the hydroxyl will be recycled over four days. Any pollution demand over this “recycled boost” will result in un-reacted pollution remaining in the air, and this critical tipping point is reached.

The tipping point has been shown here.

Lead author: Viva Cundliffe

We looked at this for urban airsheds and see a clear deficit of hydroxyls, which calls for a remediation system. You would think that mixing with remote air sheds would balance the deficit, but with global warming, plant life gives off an increased amount of volatile organic compounds, which use up hydroxyls. With an across the board depletion of this main natural atmospheric cleanser, gases and pollutants are going to build up and it’s simply a question of how fast this happens, not “if” it will.

This will significantly contribute to further global warming if nothing is done to enhance the relative hydroxyl levels. If we enhance hydroxyls, they have the potential to provide 2’C of global cooling, which is being proposed by a company in Canada.

For us to return to a stable climate, we all need to know that in an equal system, each of us can emit 16.7 Tonnes of CO2 per year, while we rapidly scale up direct air capture and removal technologies. If you emit more than this what you are doing is hurting everyone else, everything else and are wasteful and careless. All emissions above this baseline should be paid for at- or at progressive multiples of the full value and cost that it takes to technologically reduce them, not through trees.

We could reverse 2’C of warming and avoid 2’C total of warming by having hydroxyl radicals working to remove reactive GHGs according to a couple of peer reviewed papers. I have dug deep to locate what gives the most accurate picture of what we can do with hydroxyl radicals.

Table 3 shows that 2’C of warming to 2100 can be removed with reactive GHG controls 2010-2100. Extra triggered methane problems of 1’c are dealt with also.

(Arctic methane, Elena Dyupina a & Andre van Amstel a Journal of integrative environmental sciences.)

Figure 3 shows that a full degree of warming can be removed along with the reactive GHG removals.

Impact of short-lived non-CO2 mitigation on carbon budgets for stabilizing global warming, Joeri Rogelj1,2, Malte Meinshausen3,4, Michiel Schaeffer5,6, Reto Knutti2 and Keywan Riahi1,

According to peer reviewed science, we can reverse the 1’C we have now, and reverse any additional warming impact up to about a degree. This technology can be deployed now.

https://www.mintdice.com/blog/blockchain-startups-to-watch-in-2019

A study of the effects for the original hypothesis, based on a coupled climate–carbon cycle model assessed a 1000-fold (from <1 to 1000 ppmv) methane increase—within a single pulse, from methane hydrates (based on carbon amount estimates for the PETM, with ~2000 GtC), and concluded it would increase atmospheric temperatures by more than 6 °C within 80 years. Further, carbon stored in the land biosphere would decrease by less than 25%, suggesting a critical situation for ecosystems and farming, especially in the tropics.

Atsushi Obata; Kiyotaka Shibata (June 20, 2012). “Damage of Land Biosphere due to Intense Warming by 1000-Fold Rapid Increase in Atmospheric Methane: Estimation with a Climate–Carbon Cycle Model”. J. Climate. 25 (24): 8524–8541. Bibcode:2012JCli…25.8524O. doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00533.1.

National Science Foundation: 22 degrees F (12’C) in 50 years found in ice core, 11,700 years ago

HOWEVER

“Because gas hydrates globally sequester such a large amount of methane at depths that are shallow compared to those associated with conventional gas, even reputable publications sometimes posit that warming climate will lead to catastrophic breakdown of global gas hydrate deposits and the subsequent injection of the released methane into the atmosphere. Our review underscores the implausibility of such scenarios. The spatial distribution of climate-susceptible gas hydrates, the strong sinks that consume much of the methane released from gas hydrate breakdown before the gas reaches the atmosphere, and the thermodynamic barriers to runaway gas hydrate breakdown all argue against strong synergy between gas hydrates and the climate system. In fact, we estimate that seafloor emissions of hydrate-derived methane (most of which never reaches the atmosphere) is dwarfed by annual carbon dioxide emissions to the atmosphere from anthropogenic sources.”

This still leaves the question “What could cause abrupt warming that is not methane?”

source

https://eos.org/editors-vox/could-subsea-methane-hydrates-be-a-warming-tipping-point

As we scale up to use hydroxyl radicals to remove GHGs, we highlight one of the best speakers on the climate shift subject, Paul Beckwith. Paul states that there is climate emergency and goes on to show why in many of his videos at PaulBeckwith.net.

https://www.mintdice.com/blog/ripple-xrp-platform-to-begin-trading-gold-silver