As we experience the massive release of methane from pockets in the permafrost and from methane clathrates now, the globe is going to continue to heat up. The only element that can remove this methane is oxygen, which we will have enough of to do it but the problem is that the methane caused warming will last for hundreds of years unless we remove it asap.
Almost half of the warming we have is caused by synthetic greenhouse gases (Prinn et al), which can be removed by oxygen if there is a concerted effort to use it by airlift to 18-22 Km. As methane is added, this warming is going to increase and could triple the warming and raise temperatures by a total of 6’C.
If we add geoengineering caused warming to this, by attempting to “shade” the Earth, it will put more heat trapping walls up to the heat that needs to escape. Any physical barrier would cause this, and this is why I think oxygen is preferable. Oxygen breaks down all of the greenhouse gases except CO2 and water. Chemicals being used for weather modification right now are halting precipitation in many areas, like California. Oxygen across the system does not force sacrifices like this, it allows heat release from everywhere once it is diffused into the environment.
If we do not focus on the real cause of global warming, our greenhouse gas problems, we are set to suffer more and more heat accumulation that no amount of geoengineering will significantly reduce. Aerosols simply will block the heat escape mechanism we need right now and for a significant period of time.
Humanity has the capacity to airlift anything now in vast quantities. Oxygen is available in our developed nations for this airlift protocol. We have proof in the fossil record that oxygen removes greenhouse gases and oxygen is relied upon to form all the oxidants which remove pollutants and gases from the atmosphere. We need to have this airlift computer modeled and discussed in public as the non toxic alternative to geoengineering with aerosols.
Dr. Peter Wadhams states in this presentation that the methane release will ultimately cost is $60 Trillion as global warming costs. $40-50 billion for a first oxygen airlift seems reasonable to work to avoid these direct costs as indirect costs are not yet calculable.
If the oysters, scallops lobsters are losing life to CO2 levels have we gone too far on our global thermostat? Should we look at something non toxic rather than toxic? Would this method to shade the planet at the mesosphere above the Ozone layer interfere with cooling efforts from using non toxic oxygen on the clouds to remove heat? How will it help the Ozone layer which really protects life? Do the particles really levitate up there and for how long? Isn’t it just more of the same thinking used lower down or is it more appropriate and logical? What is the most important thing when you have an emergency in a large room and need to leave-the exits, we need heat to exit our atmosphere and so how is this accomplished?
Non-Toxic and Sustainable while it sustains human activity and the Natural system…
Pro-Sunlight for Plants
Pro Clean Air
Pro ozone layer
Pro rain and blue sky
Pro Clean water
Pro Clean oceans
Pro healthy ocean pH
Pro healthy ocean life food chain
Pro Clean Soil
Pro Clean Food
Pro global cooling by removing greenhouse methane and other GHG gases
Pro polluter pay
Pro sustainable ecosystems
Pro-healthy, life giving conditions of every kind
based on the geophysical principles of the Earth system
A human right as a part of the global infrastructure
Works with natural geophysical and geochemical processes and obeys the dynamics and understands the composition of the natural world and how to balance it naturally.
It is Not:
An aerosol, it is a naturally occurring gas needed for life
Geoengineering, it replaces it and restores the natural system with active reduction of carbon dioxide levels
Expensive (50 cents per year/per person for 30 years for 8 billion people)
Allied with geoengineering
Part of a secret global government
Unclear about its mandate to restore the Earth to a natural like state as much as possible
A trade off of negative effects
A depopulation agenda
Based on artificial and synthetic precepts
Military
Political
A black or classified project
Laser or directed energy enhanced
Cause wildfires, Alzheimer’s, cancer, drought, illness and diseases, or sunburning
Going to need remediation itself like geoengineering does
Applied until fully tested on a small scale
Properly funded
Unfounded in science, it is rooted in historical fossil and current scientific records and applies the chemistry relationships and consequent chemistry properties and physics which are well understood.
NATURAL, NON-TOXIC, REMEDIAL WEATHER MODIFICATION: INTRODUCTION OF THE BACKGROUND SCIENTIFIC THEORY WITH A PROCEDURAL MANUAL FOR OXYGEN ION BASED WEATHER MODIFICATION AND WITH MONITORING, DOSAGE AND DISPERSAL CALCULATIONS FOR THE VANCOUVER, BC CANADA AIR SHED SYSTEM.
The theory presented applies to all other air sheds.
There we go with the new science of Water Vapor Global Cooling where we can use the clouds and natural aerosols to deflect heat off of the Earth. the magnitude available is highlighted in the last graphic below the movie. It should be enough if the interstellar cloud we are in has given us most of its heat already around the Earth and other planets. For references see Viva’s additional blog articles. Please share this blog article and blog link and consider subscribing! Our public work will be journaled here.
