Attention to all my subscribers here- Follow Viva on YouTube @Viva1cable!
Tweet
Tag: geoengineering
Black and white contrasts of hydroxyl benefits versus other options and hydroxyl wins
A Physics and Chemistry Comparison of Solar Radiation Management to Hydroxyl Dispersal-Why Make Such Lousy Tradeoffs?
Military Documents on Forest Fires as a Military Weapon
This is stunning information about a form of global fascism within the US Military. This faction is sponsoring depopulation, foreign and domestic using desiccant aerial powders and forest fires. President Biden must remove these enemy criminals.
All of this added particulate matter also depletes the hydroxyl, our natural detergent and GHG remover which also removes forever chemicals. We are so cursed by the above program, which is a danger to everyone on Earth. Please advise President Biden. I thought we needed the trees to draw down CO2.
Six issues a non toxic oxygen airlift would address
A liquid oxygen airlift and dispersal at the lower stratosphere would address these six issues:
- Reduction and removal of synthetic greenhouse gases which are causing 80 ppm of CO2 equivalent warming to the planet.
- Ozone depleting substances removal or reduction.
- Thickening up the ozone layer, increasing needed UV protection by reducing the relative chlorine, fluorine and bromine fractions.
- Methane gas removal which appears to be becoming extremely urgent.
- Reduce acceleration of global warming and species extinction.
- Slow and may even reverse ice loss.
We have everything to gain and nothing to lose at this point as we wrestle with carbon emissions more slowly than we can afford to.
Airlift Overview
Cost: $50B, Size: 6 million Tonnes of oxygen over 5-10 years. Remember the other alternatives we have; the are toxic or take a very long time.
Warming: Its almost all about removing greenhouse gases
As we experience the massive release of methane from pockets in the permafrost and from methane clathrates now, the globe is going to continue to heat up. The only element that can remove this methane is oxygen, which we will have enough of to do it but the problem is that the methane caused warming will last for hundreds of years unless we remove it asap.
Almost half of the warming we have is caused by synthetic greenhouse gases (Prinn et al), which can be removed by oxygen if there is a concerted effort to use it by airlift to 18-22 Km. As methane is added, this warming is going to increase and could triple the warming and raise temperatures by a total of 6’C.
If we add geoengineering caused warming to this, by attempting to “shade” the Earth, it will put more heat trapping walls up to the heat that needs to escape. Any physical barrier would cause this, and this is why I think oxygen is preferable. Oxygen breaks down all of the greenhouse gases except CO2 and water. Chemicals being used for weather modification right now are halting precipitation in many areas, like California. Oxygen across the system does not force sacrifices like this, it allows heat release from everywhere once it is diffused into the environment.
If we do not focus on the real cause of global warming, our greenhouse gas problems, we are set to suffer more and more heat accumulation that no amount of geoengineering will significantly reduce. Aerosols simply will block the heat escape mechanism we need right now and for a significant period of time.
Humanity has the capacity to airlift anything now in vast quantities. Oxygen is available in our developed nations for this airlift protocol. We have proof in the fossil record that oxygen removes greenhouse gases and oxygen is relied upon to form all the oxidants which remove pollutants and gases from the atmosphere. We need to have this airlift computer modeled and discussed in public as the non toxic alternative to geoengineering with aerosols.
Dr. Peter Wadhams states in this presentation that the methane release will ultimately cost is $60 Trillion as global warming costs. $40-50 billion for a first oxygen airlift seems reasonable to work to avoid these direct costs as indirect costs are not yet calculable.
Viva Cundliffe
viva.cundliffe@gmail.com
GeoRemediation Does not Kill anyone or anything it reverses mortality trends
These gentlemen discuss the mortality potential of sulphate geoengineering.
Please look at other posts in our blog under Science and Technology to gain a better understanding of Georemediation using Oxygen Ions.
Instead of particulates there is Georemediation
If the oysters, scallops lobsters are losing life to CO2 levels have we gone too far on our global thermostat? Should we look at something non toxic rather than toxic? Would this method to shade the planet at the mesosphere above the Ozone layer interfere with cooling efforts from using non toxic oxygen on the clouds to remove heat? How will it help the Ozone layer which really protects life? Do the particles really levitate up there and for how long? Isn’t it just more of the same thinking used lower down or is it more appropriate and logical? What is the most important thing when you have an emergency in a large room and need to leave-the exits, we need heat to exit our atmosphere and so how is this accomplished?
Georemediation mops up after geoengineering
GeoRemediation: What it IS
Oxygen, oxygen oxygen,
Non-Toxic and Sustainable while it sustains human activity and the Natural system…
- Pro-Sunlight for Plants
- Pro Clean Air
- Pro ozone layer
- Pro rain and blue sky
- Pro Clean water
- Pro Clean oceans
- Pro healthy ocean pH
- Pro healthy ocean life food chain
- Pro Clean Soil
- Pro Clean Food
- Pro global cooling by removing greenhouse methane and other GHG gases
- Pro polluter pay
- Pro sustainable ecosystems
- Pro-healthy, life giving conditions of every kind
- based on the geophysical principles of the Earth system
- A human right as a part of the global infrastructure
Works with natural geophysical and geochemical processes and obeys the dynamics and understands the composition of the natural world and how to balance it naturally.
It is Not:
- An aerosol, it is a naturally occurring gas needed for life
- Geoengineering, it replaces it and restores the natural system with active reduction of carbon dioxide levels
- Expensive (50 cents per year/per person for 30 years for 8 billion people)
- Allied with geoengineering
- Part of a secret global government
- Unclear about its mandate to restore the Earth to a natural like state as much as possible
- A trade off of negative effects
- A depopulation agenda
- Based on artificial and synthetic precepts
- Military
- Political
- A black or classified project
- Laser or directed energy enhanced
- Cause wildfires, Alzheimer’s, cancer, drought, illness and diseases, or sunburning
- Going to need remediation itself like geoengineering does
- Applied until fully tested on a small scale
- Properly funded
- Unfounded in science, it is rooted in historical fossil and current scientific records and applies the chemistry relationships and consequent chemistry properties and physics which are well understood.
If you want to know more go to http://www.gcgreencarbon.com, and http://www.vivacundliffe.com and check out Viva Cundliffe on YouTube or twitter: GCGreenCarbon
Provided by Viva Cundliffe, PhD abd
Science and Geochemistry Solution That Will Stop Aerosol Spraying -a Thesis
NATURAL, NON-TOXIC, REMEDIAL WEATHER MODIFICATION: INTRODUCTION OF THE BACKGROUND SCIENTIFIC THEORY WITH A PROCEDURAL MANUAL FOR OXYGEN ION BASED WEATHER MODIFICATION AND WITH MONITORING, DOSAGE AND DISPERSAL CALCULATIONS FOR THE VANCOUVER, BC CANADA AIR SHED SYSTEM.
The theory presented applies to all other air sheds.
2018 NATURAL NONTOXIC REMEDIAL WEATHER MODIFICATION BACKGROUND SCIENTIFIC THEORY
By Viva Cundliffe
Ocean Oxygen Restoration and Atmospheric CO2 absorption after geoeningeering standown and Oxygen airlift
We will have control of CO2 in a New way-while we save the Oceans from low Oxygen;
Viva Cundliffe PhD abd
Oxygen Earth Conservation Protocol 